Reviewed and Validated – March 2006
Armed Forces
Technical GUIDE No. 30
********************************************************
Filth Flies
Significance,
Surveillance and Control in Contingency Operations
********************************************************

Published and Distributed by
Armed
Forces
Forest
Glen Section/
Office
of the Deputy Under Secretary of Defense
(Installations
and Environment)
Filth Flies
Significance, Surveillance and Control in
Contingency Operations
Editor
Dr. Graham B. White
Department of Entomology and Nematology
Contributors
LT Brian F. Prendergast, USN
Navy Environmental and Preventive Medicine Unit
6
Maj Armando L. Rosales, USAF
Brooks Air Force Base,
Dr. Edward S. Evans, Jr.
Dr. Jerome A. Hogsette, Jr.
TECHNICAL GUIDE NO. 30
FILTH FLIES
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION 2. SIGNIFICANCE OF FILTH FLIES TO MILITARY OPERATIONS 1
2-1. Historical Examples of the Medical Impact of Filth Flies 1
2-2. Current Literature on Disease Transmission by Filth Flies 2
2-3. Filth Flies As Nuisance Pests 7
SECTION 3. IMPORTANT FILTH FLY SPECIES: BIOLOGY AND BEHAVIOR 8
3-2. Musca domestica, the house fly 8
3-3. Musca sorbens, the eye fly 9
3-4. Musca autumnalis, the face fly 9
3-5. Fannia canicularis, lesser house fly; F. scalaris, latrine fly; other Fannia spp. 10
3-6. Stomoxys calcitrans, the stable fly 10
3-7. Chrysomya bezziana, the Old World screwworm 11
3-8. Cochliomyia hominivorax, the New World screwworm, primary screwworm 11
3-9. Phormia regina, the black blow fly 12
SECTION 4. SURVEILLANCE AND EVALUATION OF CONTROL EFFORTS 13
4-1. Necessity of Fly Surveys 13
4-2. Five Elements of Effective Filth Fly Surveillance 13
4-3. Surveillance Program SOPs 13
4-5. Initiating Filth Fly Surveillance 14
SECTION 5. FIELD SANITATION 17
5-1. Food Preparation Area Sanitation 17
5-2. Garbage, Rubbish and Carrion Disposal 18
SECTION 6. FILTH FLY CONTROL 20
APPENDIX A - Taxonomic Keys 25
APPENDIX
B - Field Sanitation Device Specifications 31
APPENDIX C - Fly Trap Specifications and Surveillance Forms 42
APPENDIX D - WHO Filth Fly Resistance Testing 49
APPENDIX E – Fly Control in Mortuary Affairs Facilities 50
Preparation of this
Technical Guide (TG) was facilitated by Dr. Herbert T. Bolton, CAPT USN
(retired), who generously lent his expertise to its development. Dr. Stephen B. Berté, COL USA (retired), CAPT
Mark Beavers, USN, and COL Gene Cannon,
This is one of a series of Technical Guides
(TGs) published by the Defense Pest Management Information Analysis Center
(DPMIAC), Armed Forces Pest Management Board (AFPMB). The AFPMB is a directorate within the Office
of the Deputy Under Secretary of Defense (Installations and Environment) that
recommends policies and procedures, provides guidance, and coordinates the
exchange of information related to pest management throughout the Department of
Defense (DoD). As a unit of the AFPMB,
DPMIAC collects, stores and disseminates published and unpublished information
on arthropod vectors and pests, natural resources, and environmental biology
important to the DoD. Other DPMIAC
products include country- or region-specific Disease Vector Ecology Profiles
(DVEPs). All TGs and DVEPs, as well as
DPMIAC’s database of over 200,000 articles on pest management and medical
zoology, are available at the AFPMB Web site <http://www.afpmb.org>.
TGs (formerly
Technical Information Memoranda or TIMs) are not policy documents; rather, they
provide technical guidance for the use of the DoD pest management community and
others. Accordingly, TGs should not be
construed or referenced as policy. DoD pest
management policies may be found in DoD Instruction 4715.1, "Environmental
Security," DoD Instruction 4150.7, "DoD Pest Management
Program," other DoD directives and instructions, and implementing
component directives/instructions/regulations.
Inquiries, comments or suggestions for improving TGs may be directed to
the Chief, DPMIAC, at (301) 295-7476, FAX (301) 295-7473.
SECTION
1.
INTRODUCTION
Filth
flies have been, and will continue to be, a major preventive medicine issue
during military exercises and operations conducted in warm weather. Filth flies have been implicated as disease vectors, especially in refugee and
prisoner of war camps. They can also be
a tremendous nuisance when they interfere with and degrade mission
performance. Fly problems may develop around
field messing facilities that have inadequate screening, which can result in
unsanitary conditions that make it difficult to protect food from fly-borne
contamination. Likewise, field latrines
constructed without adequate fly exclusion are virtually unusable. In mass
casualty situations, such as battlefields and natural disasters, flies will
breed in corpses and wounds if they are not controlled or excluded. For these reasons, fly control is often a
major responsibility of utmost importance for preventive medicine personnel.
This TG provides basic information about the
biology of several fly species known collectively
as filth flies. Their medical importance
and nuisance impacts are presented within the context of military operations
and exercises. In accordance with
Department of Defense policy on pesticide use, this TG also provides guidance
on preventing fly problems, and implementing control strategies using
pesticides and traps.
SIGNIFICANCE OF FILTH FLIES TO MILITARY OPERATIONS
2-1. Historical Examples of the Medical Impact of
Filth Flies
Filth flies historically have had and continue to have
an impact on combat, peacetime contingency operations, disaster
relief operations, and refugee health support operations.
Filth flies may
interfere with military operations through transmission of disease-causing
organisms, contamination of food, myiasis (larval infestation of human and
animal tissue), and annoyance or distraction from the job at hand. An increasingly persuasive body of evidence,
described in detail below, suggests that flies play a major role in the spread
of enteric disease agents. These
pathogens have impacted military operations throughout history, underscoring
the need for fly control.
Reports
of concurrent increases in fly populations and incidence of diarrhea in North
African and Middle Eastern military campaigns during World Wars I and II are
numerous (Levine and Levine 1991).
Colonel J.C.G. Ledingham (1920), Royal Army Medical Corps, Mesopotamian
Expeditionary Force in WW I, found a strong correlation between fly density and
the incidence of dysentery. In the World War II battle of El Alamein in
Flies
were a monumental nuisance during the Vietnam War. Reports from one mess hall stated that the
fly infestation was so heavy it was difficult to eat without ingesting one or
two. It is impossible to estimate the
disease transmission that may have been caused by flies in
Similar
problems were encountered in the Persian Gulf War of 1991 and in subsequent
humanitarian relief operations. In
1992-93, relief forces in
A
Korean Airlines jet crashed on
2-2. Current Literature on Disease Transmission by
Filth Flies
Filth
flies have been implicated in the direct and indirect mechanical transmission
of a number of pathogens responsible for human diseases, especially those
causing diarrheal illness. Mechanical
transmission is the transfer of pathogens from one location to another, usually
passively or unintentionally. Thus, the
mechanical transmission of disease organisms is facilitated by the adult filth
flies' habit of walking and feeding on
materials that tend to be contaminated, then doing the same on food to be
consumed by humans. Secretion of
salivary fluids (sometimes incorrectly referred to as vomiting) and defecating
while feeding also increase the potential for transmission of pathogens by
flies.
The
common factor in the ecology of several species of filth flies is their
utilization of decomposing organic
materials as food sources for the adults and developmental media for their
maggots (larvae). Considering that these
materials are often carrion, feces and food wastes (all with associated
pathogens), the potential for flies becoming contaminated can be quite high. Filth flies have numerous hair-like structures
on their legs and bodies that dramatically increase their surface area and aid in
harboring pathogens. Their deeply
channeled mouthparts and hairy feet, each with sticky pads, can easily be
contaminated when in contact with contaminated substrates. Filth flies are potential mechanical vectors
of disease-causing organisms because pathogens can be transferred from their
contaminated bodies to our food, eyes, noses, mouths, and open wounds.
Filth
flies are attracted to a variety of rotting organic materials and feces, but
they are also attracted to human foods.
In addition to the great number of pathogens filth flies may carry on
their body surfaces, they may transmit pathogens to our food in their saliva
and feces. Most filth flies have
sponging mouthparts and are capable of consuming foods only in a liquid
state. Solid foods are liquified by
regurgitating the crop contents (along with any pathogens) onto the food
material, allowing the vomit to liquefy the solid food. Flies then suck the liquefied food (along
with any pathogens) into their digestive tracts. Flies further contaminate food by defecating
on it while they feed. Fecal spots are
usually darker than vomit spots. House
flies can produce from 16 to 31 spots in 24 hours (most of them vomit spots)
after just one feeding of milk. From
this it is easy to speculate about how many spots could be produced in a food
service facility by 10, 50, or 100 flies having constant access to various food
sources. Kobayashi et al. (1999) showed
that Escherichia coli O157:H7, an
extremely virulent serotype of this common bacterium, actively proliferates in
the minute spaces of house fly mouthparts, and that this proliferation leads to
persistence of the bacteria in fly feces.
Based on

Over
one hundred pathogens that cause human disease are known to contaminate filth
flies; the most significant are listed in Table 1. The role that filth flies play in actually
transmitting pathogens to humans and to what extent this transmission leads to
disease depends on the pathogen and associated environmental factors. In some instances transmission by flies may
be significant, while in other instances it is nonexistent. Just because a pathogen is recovered from a
fly does not mean that successful transmission is possible. There is strong evidence that flies play an
important part in human illness caused by certain enteric bacterial infections
(Graczyk et al. 2001).
a. Shigella and Other
Enteric Bacterial Infections
Shigellosis
is a diarrheal disease caused by Shigella
spp. bacteria that include over 40 serotypes.
Fever, vomiting and cramps, nausea, and sometimes toxemia are recognized
symptoms. The illness is usually self-limited and runs its course in 4-7
days. Outbreaks commonly occur in
situations where sanitation has been compromised, as in poorly maintained
prisons, hospitals, day care centers, and refugee camps. Shigellosis is endemic in both temperate and
tropical environments.
Transmission
is mainly through direct or indirect fecal-oral routes, with the prime route
thought to be between individuals who fail to wash their hands after
defecation. Bacteria are transmitted
from contaminated hands to the human or food that they contact. The introduction of only a few Shigella
bacteria (as few as 10) can cause illness.
While shigellosis transmission is felt to be primarily a disease of
unwashed hands, Watt and Lindsay (text box) (1948) showed a strong
correlation between filth fly populations and Shigella rates in humans.
Cohen et al. (1991) found similar results, including reduced
seroconversion in patients, in Israeli military camps where intensive fly control strategies were employed. Recently, Chavasse et al. (1999) described
dramatic reductions in diarrheal rates associated with fly control in rural
Pakistani villages.

There are strong associations between filth
flies and several other diseases (yaws, eye disease, polio, tuberculosis, and
various parasites). However, the
importance of filth flies in causing human illness through transmission of
these pathogens remains undetermined.
b. Myiasis
Myiasis is the invasion of tissues or organs of
living humans or animals by fly larvae that may feed on the host’s living or
dead tissue (gangrenous or necrotic) or on food ingested by the host. Host reactions may be asymptomatic, minor to
violent, or even death. This review will
concentrate on human myiasis, in which almost any exposed part of the body is
at risk. Myiasis classification may be
based on the parts of the body affected, such as enteric (gastrointestinal,
gastric, or intestinal), rectal, urogenital, aural (ear), ocular, cutaneous,
nasopharyngeal and traumatic (wound) myiasis.
Myiasis classification may also be based on the separation of
myiasis-producing Diptera into the following three groups.
(1) Accidental Myiasis
Accidental myiasis is most often the result of ingesting
maggot-contaminated food. Flies in this
group don't require or seek a living body to invade. In fact, most ingested fly larvae are unable
to complete their life cycles in the human digestive system. However, enteric myiasis can cause malaise,
nausea, vomiting, pain in the abdomen, and bloody diarrhea. Living and dead larvae may pass in the stool. Over 50 species of fly larvae are known to
cause enteric myiasis. The most common are
the house fly (Musca domestica), the lesser house fly (Fannia canicularis), the latrine fly (Fannia scalaris), and the false stable fly (Muscina
stabulans). One of the most problematic fly species
associated with enteric myiasis is the cheese skipper (Piophila casei). Cheese skipper females lay eggs on cured
meats, old cheese, smoked fish and other materials. The larvae often penetrate the surface fairly
deeply, particularly in meat, and go unseen.
When humans unintentionally consume cheese skipper larvae, the maggots
pass through the digestive system alive, resulting in serious intestinal
lesions. Other fly larvae that can
survive the human digestive system include the black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens) and the drone fly (Eristalis
tenax). Both species are documented to cause severe
gastrointestinal disturbances.
Another form of accidental myiasis is rectal,
in which flies that feed and develop in excrement deposit their immature stages
in fecal material around the anus of humans living in unsanitary conditions,
especially infants and sick adults who are unable to care for themselves. The larvae of excrement feeders, such as the
drone fly, lesser house fly, latrine fly, false stable fly, and certain flesh
flies (Sarcophagidae), will move into the rectum or terminal part of the
intestine to complete their development.
Facultative myiasis occurs when fly species
that normally develop in feces or dead animals lay their eggs or deposit their
larvae in the tissues of living humans or animals. Maggots of these flies can develop in a
living host feeding on dead tissues, but they sometimes invade living tissues
as well. Urogenital and traumatic facultative
myiasis occur most frequently. Vaginal
myiasis is a concern of increased importance because of the larger numbers of
women serving in deployed units.
Urogenital myiasis occurs in warm weather when
people sleep uncovered. Since the fly
species involved are not nocturnally active, eggs are probably laid on affected
areas during low light periods of the evening or early morning. Egg laying may be stimulated by discharges
from diseased genitals. The result is
obstruction, pain, pus, mucus, bleeding, and a frequent desire to urinate. Larvae are expelled with urine. Flies most commonly associated with
urogenital myiasis are the house fly, lesser house fly, latrine fly, and false
stable fly.
Flies associated with facultative traumatic
myiasis are usually carrion breeders.
The blow flies (Calliphoridae) are most commonly involved, but flesh
flies (Sarcophagidae) and house flies
are also known to infest wounds. These
flies are normally attracted to odors produced by rotting meat or carrion, and are likewise
drawn to foul-smelling, neglected wounds.
This can be a potentially serious problem, especially with patients that are to some
degree helpless. Infestations can be
quite painful. The maggots feed primarily
on necrotic tissue, but they may also invade
living tissue. Blow flies known to cause
facultative traumatic myiasis include the black blow fly (Phormia
(3) Obligatory Myiasis
Flies involved in obligatory myiasis are incapable
of reproducing without a living host for larvae to feed upon. These flies include blow flies
(Calliphoridae), flesh flies (Sarcophagidae), and bot flies (Oestridae,
Hypodermatidae and Gasterophilidae).
The primary screwworm (Cochliomyia hominivorax)
is a true obligate parasite. Adult
females lay eggs only in living tissues of warm-blooded animals and humans; not
on cold-blooded animals like reptiles and amphibians, nor in carrion or
decaying meat or vegetables. Females are
strongly attracted to and lay eggs in open wounds, sores, and the bite sites of
ticks and blood-feeding flies.
Individual females may lay up to 2,800 eggs in batches of 10 to
400. Adults are a deep metallic
greenish-blue, with three thoracic stripes and cheeks covered with yellow,
orange or reddish hairs. Without proper
keys, it is often difficult to separate larvae
and adults of this species from the secondary screwworm (Cochliomyia macellaria)
(James 1947).
The
primary screwworm is notorious for producing serious morbidity and mortality in
livestock. Modern control measures,
namely the USDA sterile male release program, have eradicated this fly from the
The bot and warble flies (Oestridae) are
obligate parasites of animals that often infest livestock and pets. However, they can infest humans who work with
or live near infested animals. Adult bot
flies are distinguished from other flies by their hairy, bumblebee-like
bodies. Larvae are large and often
armored with spines that make removal from flesh difficult. In humans, larvae of the horse bot (Gasterophilus intestinalis) penetrate unbroken skin. Larvae cause a form of cutaneous creeping
myiasis as they burrow freely in the skin.
Burrowing is usually accompanied by severe itching. Since humans are not the horse bot's normal
host, the larvae are unable to survive past the first stage. However, larvae of the ox warble or cattle
grub (Hypoderma bovis) are able to complete their larval
cycle in humans, often with serious consequences. Cattle grub larvae penetrate unbroken skin
and may wander in the tissues of the arms and legs as they develop. As they reach the end of their cycle, larvae
move upward, often causing cutaneous creeping myiasis as they search for a site
to form a warble in the skin. Besides
the severe pain that accompanies creeping myiasis, localized paralysis may
occur if larvae invade the spinal cord.
Larvae of the sheep bot (Oestris
ovis) do not survive for
long in humans, although they invade the eyes causing ophthalmomyiasis with
accompanying pain and inflamation.
The human bot fly, Dermatobia hominis, is
common in parts of
2-3. Filth Flies As Nuisance Pests
The great amounts of
filth and carrion encountered by military personnel during war, peace keeping,
and humanitarian operations are capable of producing huge numbers of filth
flies. These flies not only disrupt
military operations by affecting human health, but in large numbers they can
distract personnel from their work and can significantly degrade morale.
The house fly female is capable of producing
about 120 eggs 4 to 6 times in her lifetime.
Larvae that hatch from these eggs can develop into adults in about 7
days. The potential for a house fly
population explosion in warm conditions during contingencies (poor sanitation,
large numbers of refugees or prisoners of war, and/or numerous exposed
cadavers) is quite high. Stable flies, Stomoxys calcitrans (usually), are among
the few filth flies that bite. Although
they are not associated with disease transmission, they can be a formidable
nuisance because both sexes must take blood meals to reproduce.
Numerous anecdotal accounts exist of huge filth
fly populations in all wars, and in several operations and exercises involving
the
It is difficult to quantify the emotional
effects of large numbers of flies on personnel in an already stressful
environment. However, large populations
of filth flies certainly distract personnel from their duties. Proper management of latrine wastes, garbage,
and dining facilities will significantly reduce fly numbers. This, in turn, will result in more attentive
and effective personnel, greatly improving the chances for successful
operations in garrison, onboard ship, and in the field.